Every year on December 6, I mark the anniversary of the Montreal Massacre by taking a moment of silence in class after reading the names of the murdered women.
People across Canada today, and especially on university and college campuses, will be marking this anniversary with speeches, candlelight vigils, and moments of silence. I hope we can all find some time in our classes, homes, or offices to remember the following young women who lost their lives eighteen years ago today.
Victims of the Montreal Massacre at l'École Polytechnique on December 6, 1989
Geneviève Bergeron
Hélène Colgan
Nathalie Croteau
Barbara Daigneault
Anne-Marie Edward
Maud Haviernick
Barbara Klucznik Widajewicz
Maryse Laganière
Maryse Leclair
Anne-Marie Lemay
Sonia Pelletier
Michèle Richard
Annie St-Arneault
Annie Turcotte
In Canada, December 6 is the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women in Canada. Established in 1991 by the Parliament of Canada, this day coincides with the sad anniversary of the death of fourteen young women who were tragically killed on December 6, 1989 at l'École Polytechnique in Montréal because of their gender.
Here are the essay questions for the final, as well as the layout of the first part of the exam.
For the essay questions, only two of those listed below will be on the actual final. So, you should plan out how you would respond to at least two of them; if you plan for only one of them, you might find that it is the one I've chosen not to include. When you prepare to write on the essay topics, give yourself some flexibility as to which texts you might use so that you can have a wider range of choice for the passage identifications. Remember that you can't deal with the same work twice over the course of the exam, so you need to be ready to discuss all of the books we've covered in the course.
PART A (40 points):
CHOOSE FOUR OF THE FOLLOWING SEVEN PASSAGES AND IDENTIFY THE FOLLOWING:
ANSWER ONLY IN COMPLETE SENTENCES AND PUT YOUR ANSWER IN PARAGRAPH FORM. WRITE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN WHEN ANSWERING EACH OF THESE. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ANSWER THE QUESTION FULLY IN JUST A FEW SHORT SENTENCES.
PART B (40 points):
USING AS YOUR CHIEF EXAMPLES THREE TEXTS WE HAVE DISCUSSED IN CLASS, WRITE AN ESSAY THAT FULLY ANSWERS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS (N.B. only two of the following questions will be on the actual final exam)
1. In this course, we have studied a wide variety of Canadian fiction. If someone were to ask you what Canadian fiction is like, how would you describe it based on what we've read? Your answer must take into account the complex issues we have discussed in class as well as the diversity of texts we have read. Your discussion must also include a detailed discussion of at least three texts covered in this course.
2. Almost everyone of the books we read this semester engages with the tenuous line between "fact" and "fiction." Looking at three of the books we've read, examine this theme and describe how it comes into play in each work.
3. Memory is a significant theme in many of the works we have looked at in this course. With reference to three of the texts we have read in the class, discuss the role of memory in each.
N.B. Over the course of the exam, you may not focus on the same work twice.
We've briefly discussed this in class a couple of times, but here's a more extensive breakdown of how I determine blog and participation grades:
Blog grade:
A: To earn an A on the blog component of the course all assignments must have been completed and comments posted by the assigned deadline. Comments are thoughtful, fully answer the question asked, and, if specified, take into account the comments of other students.
B: All assignments completed, mostly on time. Thoughtful comments, though perhaps briefer and less engaging than those that merit an A.
C: Most assignments completed, primarily at the end of the semester and/or comments are short, perfunctory answers to the blog prompt with little consideration of the comments of others.
D: Only partial completion of the assignments and comments show little commitment to making a contribution to the discussion.
F: Failure to complete more than 50% of the assigned blog questions.
Participation grade:
A: Nearly 100% attendance, unless due to illness or family emergency AND active participation in class. Clearly on top of the reading and regularly speaks in class. Always engaged in the discussion, whether vocally contributing or not.
B: Missed very few classes (2 or 3 max), unless due to illness or family emergency. Participated in class vocally on a fairly regular basis, but, more importantly, is always listening and attentive to the ongoing discussion. Unprepared for class occasionally, but usually caught up on the reading and willing to contribute.
C: Misses more than three classes for reasons other than illness or family emergency. Clearly behind in the reading on at least several occasions. Mostly attentive and speaks in class several times over the course of the semester. Makes a good effort to stay involved in class discussion and appears interested.
D: Regularly missing from class and/or frequently appears disinterested. Routinely behind on reading and fails to bring books to class. Leaves class from time to time to take phone calls thinking that the professor thinks they are using the bathroom, continually passes notes back and forth with someone else, works on other homework, reads the newspaper during class, checks e-mail or text messages while instructor or classmates are speaking, all of which, I should add, are apparent to the instructor and your classmates and immediately qualify you for a D.
F: Attendance and participation not worthy of a D or higher. Failure to attend most classes and/or to participate in any meaningful way.
So, now that you've finished reading Monkey Beach, what did you think? Which part(s) of the book did you find most interesting? Any questions about the book you'd like us to cover in class?
You might also want to check out the video of Eden Robinson's reading here last fall.
As we discussed in detail on November 13, your assignment for the second essay is to create your own topic that allows you to look at a common theme or connection between two of the final books we've looked at in this course (The Diviners, In the Skin of a Lion, George and Rue, and Monkey Beach). If there's a different Canadian book that you've read that you'd like to discuss in your essay, you may do so in place of one of the other texts we've read in class.
Make sure that the topic is narrow enough that you can answer it sufficiently and in enough detail in a 2000 word essay. Although I've chosen not to require you to do secondary research, I encourage you to do so if it's relevant to your topic.
I recommend that you run your topic by me either in person or by e-mail. I'm also willing, if time permits, to review introductory paragraphs and/or outlines to help make certain that you are on the right track.
DUE: Tuesday, December 4th. Extensions are a possibility, but if you do ask for one I can't guarantee that you'll receive your essay back much before the exam on December 10.
WORD LENGTH: 2000 words

As a supplement to our reading of George and Rue, you might be interested in checking out the following links:
Many of the books we've dealt with this year have been ones in which we've looked at the connections between the works of literature and actual people and/or events. This is particularly relevant to George Elliott Clarke's George and Rue in that it retells the story of a violent murder committed by George and Rufus Hamilton and of their trial and execution for the crime. The novel, though, as Clarke tells us in the "Verdict" section of the book, is "fiction, and [Clarke has] taken prodigious and relentless liberties with 'facts,' so that psychologies, identites, genealogies, and even some place descriptions are purely imaginary" (219).
What is your reaction to these "relentless liberties"? Does an artist have a responsibility to stay as "true" to the past as he or she can, or is it in fact his or her responsibility to create a powerful work of art first that helps us to understand the past through a different lens?
It is important to know that the places and a number of the characters described in the book were real (Ondaatje did meticulous research into the history of Toronto and its immigrant populations while writing the novel). You can find some helpful background information about these places online. One of the most fascinating webpages you'll find on the novel is this one from the City of Toronto Archives. Here you can see some of the actual photographs described in the novel, including the picture of two men shaking hands in the tunnel underneath Lake Ontario and the one of the cyclist darting across the Bloor Street Viaduct on the day it was christened and opened to the public.
You'll see a period photo of the Harris Filtration plant, the "Palace of Purification" on the City of Toronto Archives site, but this plant still exists and it has its own website where you can actually do a virtual tour of the complex. There's also an aerial shot here.
I'm happy to meet with those of you who didn't get a copy of Next Episode in time for our discussions of the novel. If you did have the book, but would still like to meet to discuss the book, that's great, too.
Here are two slots where I'm available in the next few days. Please let me know if you intend to come, as I might make other plans for this time if I don't hear from anyone. If neither of these times works for you, let me know and we can set something else up. I don't expect we'll need more than one hour, but I'm making these spots 90 minutes in case we need more than that.
Thursday, Nov. 8: 1 - 2:30 pm
Friday, Nov. 9: 9:30 - 11 AM
Friday, Nov. 9: 2:00 - 3:30 pm
What's your reaction to In the Skin of a Lion? What part(s) of this book did you find most interesting and/or enjoyable?
What do you find to be the most interesting part of The Diviners? In your response, include a passage or two from the text that illustrates what you're saying about the text.
Copies of Next Episode, The Diviners, and George and Rue arrived at the bookstore this afternoon.
FINALLY! My apologies for the delays with these. I've been just as frustrated with this as you have been.
Once everyone's through catching up on Next Episode, I'll schedule a time where a small group of us (and
anyone else who'd like to talk more about the book) can meet to discuss it.
If you don't have The Diviners yet, please go and pick it up before class tomorrow and finish reading it
over the weekend.
Here's the alternate assignment in lieu of participating the Ottawa trip, which is worth 5% of your final grade.
Go to the library and locate a short story by a Canadian writer. Write a short review of the story (a minimum of 250 words) and post it here on the blog (in the comments on this post).
A couple of quick tips: While you might want to tell us what happens in the story (the plot), this should be a very small part of your review. Your main focus should be on what you think the story is about and what you found most interesting about the work.
The other tip is that when you find the short story in the library, make a photocopy of it so that the book it's from can remain on the shelves. That will be of help to your classmates.
Here's your make-up assignment. Sorry for the delay in coming up with this....
As a producer and director, James Douglas has championed new works of Canadian theatre. Given that we're focusing only on fiction in our course, I thought this would be a great opportunity for you to do a bit of research on Canadian theatre.
So, using your best internet or library research skills, search out a Canadian play and in 150 words or more tell us a bit about it. Include the URLs or publication information of the sources you use. (You could also decide to focus on a Canadian playwright)
What are your first reactions to Aquin's Next Episode? What did you notice most about the book? What questions do you have that you would like us to consider in our class discussions?
We'll be adding a few more specific details to our Ottawa itinerary in the coming week or so, but here is a pretty complete look at what we'll be up to while we're there.
Continue reading "Ottawa itinerary"What were your reactions to James B. Douglas' performance? Did it change the way you read or think of Leacock?

SUNSHINE AND SHADOWS: AN AFTERNOON WITH STEPHEN LEACOCK
Performed by James B. DouglasTUESDAY, SEPT. 25th, 4:00 PMMann Auditorium, Trinity Campus, University of Vermont"[Emmanuel] felt an intense distress. It seemed to him that he was alone in the universe, on the edge of the abyss, holding in his hands the most fragile, tenuous of threads, that of the eternal human enigma. Which of the two, wealth or spirit, should sacrifice itself? Which of the two possessed the true power of redemption?"
Does the The Tin Flute suggest an answer to this "eternal human enigma" ? What do you think about this? If you had to choose, what would you do?
Gabrielle Roy's Bonheur d'occasion (translated as The Tin Flute) is, I think, the most important novel written in Canada during the 1940s and it's set just 90 minutes from here in Montreal. Looking at it now, 60 years after its publication, what was your reaction to it? What do you think is the most interesting aspect of this novel?
What is your first reaction to Stephen Leacock's Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town?
Did anything surprise you about the book? What about it did you find most interesting?
Seeing as we're all going to be reading each other's comments over the next 13 weeks, let's use the opportunity of our first blog post to get to know each other a bit better.
As I mentioned the other day, please use just your first name and last initial (the last initial is especially important if you are one of the several Emilys, Joshuas, Davids, Andrews, or Ashleys we have in this class). Do, though, tell us a bit about your background and what you're hoping to learn in this course. Do you have any connections to Canada or anything that especially intrigues you about Canada? Also, tell us a bit about your favourite writers and/or types of literature that you like to read.
Just click on the syllabus tab at the top of this window and you'll see our full syllabus for Fall 2007.
Read below the break for the full syllabus from the Fall 2006 version of English 180 (the course usually changes every year)
Continue reading "Syllabus for English 180 - Fall 2006"I'll have a complete syllabus posted later in August, but here's the basic description of the course and a list of the books we'll be studying.
English 180: Topics in Canadian Literature
This course is a broad survey of the last hundred years of fiction in Canada, from before the First World War to the present day. We will cover novels and stories by writers from Canada’s three founding peoples (English, French, and First Nations), but our primary focus will be on texts originally written in English. Throughout the course, we will also interrogate the connection between literature, place, and identity. By covering a wide range of texts from different language and cultural communities and from different regions of Canada, we will gain some perspective of the diversity of Canada, its peoples, and its literatures. At the same time, we will also question the assumptions we inevitably make about any country and its people through reading its literature. As with any survey course covering such a large period of time and variety of literary expression, the selections of readings is not meant to be comprehensive, but rather provides you with a wide sampling of periods, genres, and authors.
Texts will include:
Stephen Leacock, Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town (Norton Critical Edition only)
Gabrielle Roy, The Tin Flute
Hubert Aquin, Next Episode
Margaret Laurence, The Diviners
Michael Ondaatje, In the Skin of a Lion
George Elliott Clarke, George and Rue
Eden Robinson, Monkey Beach
(full disclosure: I am a part owner of Northwest Passages)
I'll have the fall 2007 syllabus posted in the next several weeks. Stay tuned!
If you're signed up for the class, I hope you'll seriously consider taking part in the annual Ottawa field trip which will run this year from October 18-20. The trip is a blast and will definitely be one of your most memorable events here at UVM.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent Comments
Dr. Bardou on Blog and participation grades: What were the results of testing students?
dissertation help on Blog assignment for The Englishman's Boy: What truly scares me most about this issue is maki
Chris on Remembering December 6, 1989: That's real sad. Stop this gender-based violence,
Ephena on Blog assignment for The Englishman's Boy: There are some great American spirit movies sure,